Elmo vs Amadora
Elmo is an open-source, self-hostable alternative to Amadora, an AI visibility tracking tool. Both measure how AI answer engines describe your brand, but Elmo ships every line of code, runs on your own infrastructure, and is free to self-host — so your data stays yours and each metric is independently verifiable.
The short version
Amadora has no sentiment analysis. Elmo has all of that, and it's free to self-host.
Amadora appears to be a very early-stage product with limited adoption.
Elmo
Open-source AEO platform. Self-host for free, forever. Track AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews with full transparency.
Amadora
GEO tooling packaged as a billable agency service line
About Amadora
Amadora is built around agencies selling GEO as a retainer: one dashboard covers every client brand, citation gap analysis shows which sources AI engines trust and where competitors are cited but the client is not, and audits convert into client-ready action plans with concrete instructions such as which sources to get listed on. Visibility is sliced by country and language for multi-geo clients.
Popularity grade: D
- Framed around making GEO a billable, provable agency service rather than a dashboard
- Citation gap analysis names the specific sources to go earn placement on
- Multi-client dashboard with per-country and per-language slicing
Feature comparison
| Feature | Elmo | Amadora |
|---|---|---|
| Core Tracking | ||
| Multi-LLM Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| AI Visibility Score | Yes | Yes |
| Citation Analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Competitor Benchmarking | Yes | Yes |
| Brand Mention Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| AI Engines | ||
| ChatGPT | Yes | Yes |
| Google AI Overviews | Yes | Yes |
| Google AI Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Gemini | Yes | Yes |
| Perplexity | Yes | Yes |
| Microsoft Copilot | Yes | Yes |
| Claude | Yes | Yes |
| Grok | Yes | Yes |
| DeepSeek | Yes | No |
| Meta AI | Yes | No |
| Any Model | Yes | No |
| Real UI Answers | Yes | Yes |
| Bring Your Own Keys | Yes | No |
| Platform | ||
| White-Label / Agency | Yes | Yes |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Content Generation | No | Yes |
| Advanced Analytics | ||
| Prompt Volume Estimates | No | No |
| Sentiment Analysis | Yes | No |
| Query Fan-Out | Yes | No |
| AI Crawler Analytics | No | No |
| Geographic Tracking | No | Yes |
| Social Media Tracking | No | No |
| Shopping Tracking | No | No |
| Multi-Language | No | Yes |
| Actionable Insights | ||
| Action Recommendations | Yes | Yes |
| Content Gap Analysis | Yes | Yes |
| AI Site Audits | No | Yes |
| AI Keyword Research | Yes | Yes |
| Reporting & Integration | ||
| Email Alerts | No | No |
| API Access | Yes | Yes |
| TypeScript SDK | Yes | No |
| Python SDK | Yes | No |
| MCP Access | Yes | Yes |
| BI Connectors | No | No |
We last checked Amadora against its own site in Oct 2026. Spot an error? Suggest a correction or edit the data on GitHub.
Key differences
Only in Elmo
- DeepSeek
- Meta AI
- Any Model
- Bring Your Own Keys
- Open Source
- Sentiment Analysis
- Query Fan-Out
- TypeScript SDK
- Python SDK
Both offer
- Multi-LLM Tracking
- AI Visibility Score
- Citation Analytics
- Competitor Benchmarking
- Brand Mention Tracking
- ChatGPT
- Google AI Overviews
- Google AI Mode
- Gemini
- Perplexity
- Microsoft Copilot
- Claude
- Grok
- Real UI Answers
- White-Label / Agency
- Action Recommendations
- Content Gap Analysis
- AI Keyword Research
- API Access
- MCP Access
Only in Amadora
- Content Generation
- Geographic Tracking
- Multi-Language
- AI Site Audits
Why choose Elmo over Amadora?
Open source and transparent
Every line of code is open. You can verify exactly how your visibility data is collected, calculated, and presented. No black boxes.
Self-host for free, forever
Run Elmo on your own infrastructure. The core platform is free and always will be, and Elmo Cloud is there if you would rather not run it yourself.
Your data, in your stack
Pull every metric, sentiment included, into your own code with the REST API and TypeScript and Python SDKs, or ask Claude Code and Cursor about it over MCP. Export, fork, or migrate at any time.
Built to last
Bootstrapped and sustainable. No investors pushing towards dark patterns. We'll outlast the companies taking too much VC money.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is the difference between Elmo and Amadora?
- Elmo is an open-source, self-hostable AI visibility platform, while Amadora is a closed-source AI visibility tracking tool. Both track how AI answer engines describe your brand, but Elmo gives you the full source code and runs on your own infrastructure, so you can verify every metric and keep your data in-house.
- Is Elmo a free, open-source alternative to Amadora?
- Yes. Elmo is a free, open-source alternative to Amadora. You can self-host the full platform at no cost, read every line of code, and track your AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews without per-seat or per-prompt fees.
- Is Amadora open source?
- No, Amadora is a hosted product without public source code. Elmo is fully open source, so you can read how each metric is calculated, self-host it on your own infrastructure, and take your data with you.
- How do Elmo and Amadora compare on sentiment analysis, API access, and MCP?
- Elmo includes all three: a 0 to 100 sentiment score for every AI answer that mentions you, a REST API with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and an MCP server so assistants like Claude Code and Cursor can query your data. Amadora offers API access and an MCP server, but we have not found it offering sentiment analysis.
- Can I self-host Elmo instead of Amadora?
- Yes. Elmo is designed to be self-hosted — deploy it on your own infrastructure in minutes with the CLI. You keep full ownership of your data and prompts, with no per-seat pricing and no third-party dashboard holding your visibility history.
Ready to track your AI visibility?
Deploy Elmo in minutes and start monitoring how ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews talk about your brand.