AirOps vs AthenaHQ

AirOps and AthenaHQ are both AI visibility tools that measure how AI answer engines describe your brand. AirOps is pitched as "Content Engineering platform with AI workflows and Page360". AthenaHQ leans on "Action-focused AI blindspot detection with content workflows". Both are closed and hosted, so neither lets you see how its scores are built. Elmo tracks the same engines as an open-source tool you run yourself, which makes it the third option worth weighing here.

/ FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between AirOps and AthenaHQ?

AirOps is a content generation tool, while AthenaHQ is an AI visibility tracking tool, so they come at AI visibility from different angles. On features, AirOps stands out for Data Export / API, while AthenaHQ adds Competitor Benchmarking and Sentiment Analysis. Both are closed-source and hosted.

Is AirOps or AthenaHQ better for AI visibility tracking?

Neither is simply better; it depends on your priorities. Both track how AI engines mention and cite your brand across the major models, so the decision comes down to which feature set and workflow suit your team. Since both are proprietary and hosted, it is also worth trying an open-source option like Elmo, which you can self-host and audit before committing.

Is there an open-source alternative to AirOps and AthenaHQ?

Yes. Elmo is an open-source AI visibility platform you can self-host for free. It tracks mentions, citations, and competitor share across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, and every metric is auditable in the code.